• Skip to main content

Nevada Senate Dems want to tax weed at higher rate than governor does

Published: May 10, 2017, 9:17 am • Updated: May 10, 2017, 9:17 am

By The Associated Press

CARSON CITY, Nev. — Democratic lawmakers on Tuesday advanced a marijuana sales tax measure that goes farther than the Republican governor’s plan.

Gov. Brian Sandoval proposed in January that the state impose a 10 percent sales tax on recreational pot and send the revenue, expected to total $70 million over two years, to public schools.

The Senate Democrats’ measure would impose a 12 percent sales tax on all marijuana, with 10 percent going toward public schools and 2 percent funding substance abuse programs.

The bill would also raise taxes on medical marijuana growing facilities to the same 15 percent rate planned for recreational pot growers.

Medical marijuana sales and growers are currently taxed 2 percent.

“It was important that we have an efficient and streamlined taxation system that took into account medical marijuana and now recreational marijuana so that it was something that we could implement in the real world,” said bill sponsor Sen. Julia Ratti, a Democrat from the Reno suburb of Sparks.

The Senate Revenue and Economic Development Committee passed Senate Bill 487 on a party-line vote.

Nevada voters decided in November to allow people age 21 or older to use pot recreationally — becoming one of eight states to do so.

Recreational marijuana sales are expected to begin in July.

Georgia governor signs expansion of who can legally possess CBD oil

Published: May 10, 2017, 8:09 am • Updated: May 10, 2017, 8:09 am

By Kathleen Foody, The Associated Press

ATLANTA — Georgia Gov. Nathan Deal approved an expansion of the state’s medical marijuana program on Tuesday, allowing people being treated for six additional medical conditions to possess cannabis oil.

The new qualifying conditions include autism, AIDS, Tourette’s syndrome, and Alzheimer’s disease. Patients must register with the state to be eligible and have a doctor’s permission.

Many of the additions restrict use to patients who are in severe or end-stage condition. The new law also allows people in a hospice program, regardless of diagnosis, to legally possess the oil that’s low in THC, the chemical responsible for the marijuana high.

The measure’s sponsor, Rep. Allen Peake, has received national attention for his work on the issue and taking part in a network that gets the oil into patients’ hands from other states where it can be sold and manufactured legally. Georgia doesn’t allow that. Peake introduced separate legislation this year to allow a small number of medical cannabis manufacturers licensed and regulated by the state but opposition from Deal and law enforcement halted any debate.

“I’m grateful to my colleagues, Speaker David Ralston, and Lieutenant Governor Casey Cagle for their support in getting this bill to Governor Deal’s desk,” Peake said. “My hope is that in 2018 we can fill the gaping hole that still remains, and provide legal access to medical cannabis oil here in our state with a safe, lab tested product produced within our own borders. The job will not be finished until we accomplish this task.”

Tuesday marked the final deadline for the governor to sign or veto lawmakers’ proposals.

Calls grow in Florida for special legislative session on medical marijuana

Published: May 10, 2017, 7:47 am • Updated: May 10, 2017, 7:47 am

By Joe Reedy, The Associated Press

TALLAHASSEE, Fla. — A leader behind last year’s passage of a constitutional amendment on medical marijuana in Florida has joined growing calls for Gov. Rick Scott and legislative leaders to hold a special session to finalize rules for its implementation.

Orlando attorney John Morgan, who lobbied for Amendment 2’s passage through the group United for Care, said it is Scott’s obligation to convene a special session so that the Legislature can finish work on a bill putting the enacting rules in place.

“Government in Florida is controlled by one party. What you’ve got to understand is medical marijuana is not an issue of party. Diseases don’t pick political parties,” Morgan said in a video . “It was all about money in the end and not about you.”

Gov. Scott’s office said through a spokesperson that it continues to review all options.

If a special session isn’t held, the Department of Health would need to come up with rules by July 3 and have them implemented by October. Amendment 2 allows higher-strength marijuana to be used for a wider list of medical ailments It was enacted on Jan. 3 after being passed by 71 percent of voters last November.

Currently, low-THC and non-smoked cannabis can be used by patients suffering from cancer, epilepsy, chronic seizures and chronic muscle spasms. The law was expanded last year to include patients with terminal conditions. It also allowed them to use more potent strains.

That bill fell apart on the final day of session when the Senate and House could not agree on how many retail dispensaries a medical marijuana treatment center could operate.

Morgan later told The Associated Press that he wanted to post the video to get his complete thoughts out there. After the bill fell short of passage, Morgan took to social media voicing his frustration over the process.

“The video was posted in order to get the focus back on the people and getting something passed,” he said. “We’ve had our food fights, now is the time to move forward. The whole thing is the people who need the marijuana don’t give a damn about the caps.”

Morgan said there were some parts of the proposed bill that he liked, but that he would have sued since the bill did not allow for smoking as one of the ways patients could use marijuana. The amendment states that the only place where smoking is not allowed is public spaces.

He also had some concerns about the definitions of chronic pain. The bill would have allowed those who suffer chronic pain related to one of 10 qualifying conditions to receive either low-THC cannabis or full strength medical marijuana.

The Department of Health continues to review public comments while coming up with proposed rules. Litigation is expected over whatever rules the department comes up with, based on its prior rulemaking history.

Senate President Joe Negron on Monday said that the Legislature does have a responsibility to be involved in rules implementation.

Sen. Rob Bradley, who was the Senate’s lead marijuana negotiator during session, also said he preferred that the Legislature get involved before next year’s session starts in January.

Follow Joe Reedy on Twitter at www.twitter.com/joereedy. Read more of his work at https://apnews.com/search/joe%20reedy

What it’s like to be a cannabis cultivation entrepreneur: Interview with Colorado’s Veritas Fine Cannabis

Published: May 9, 2017, 9:24 pm • Updated: May 10, 2017, 9:43 am

By YourHub Staff

Business: Veritas Fine Cannabis
Address: Produced in Denver, sold in various dispensaries
Hours: Depending on dispensary
Founded: 2016
Contact: 303-500-6577, veritascannabis.com, @TrustVeritas
Employees: 50

Interview with Toby Ripsom and Mike Leibowitz, founding partners

Q: How did you get involved in this business?
A: Toby: I moved to the Denver area in 2012 from Idaho where I had built a career in institutional finance and real estate. I quickly realized that there was a space for entrepreneurs to transition into the cannabis industry, as much of the risk was optical — perceived risk versus actual risk. I knew that with the right partner we could mitigate any potential issues, and that the right business model could be very successful.
Mike: I worked in real estate through 2009 toward the end of the crash of the market and knew I needed to make a shift in my career. I have always been interested in the cannabis marketplace, and I began working with various cultivation warehouses and companies before settling into my current role with Veritas as a cannabis wholesale distributor.

Q: What distinguishes you from other businesses in your category?
A: We do not automate any part of our grow, whereas most commercial grow operations automate the majority of the process. It’s easy to grow weed — but it’s difficult, time-consuming and much more expensive to grow quality weed. From seedlings, we nourish our plants with premium plant food and attentive care, also using proprietary genetics in order to protect our product from being emulated. Our team of experienced master growers works tirelessly to care for the plants, a meticulous process completed without any automation, resulting in buds with high density, richer flavor and more vibrant colors. The cost of growing Veritas is about three times more than the average marijuana plant in Colorado, resulting in a superior product that offers consistent effects each time for the consumer.

Q: What do you like best about your line of work?
A: Working in this industry is emotionally, physically and financially rewarding. We’re kicking open the doors of this emerging market and fighting the stigma of marijuana, which has been demonized throughout history. The industry is still very young and it’s up to entrepreneurs like ourselves to shift that perception.

Q: What is your business’ biggest challenge?
A: Because this is an emerging industry, legislation regulations and taxation are constantly changing. With a highly saturated and competitive market in Colorado, it’s also important for us to differentiate our products and distinguish them as the best. We’re constantly innovating new strains and grow techniques, focusing on separating ourselves from commodity weed. We like to make the comparison of weed to wine — there are cheap options and the quality scales up to extremely gourmet and specialty products. With this diamond market mindset, we know that we have loyal customers based on the superior quality, all-encompassing nature of our products.

Q: Something people might be surprised to learn about you or your business:
A: This line of work requires constant attention and focus, and we’re obsessed with what we do. We don’t view our positions as merely jobs, but as a way of life — something more meaningful than clocking in and out each day. Everyone employed with us has a major sense of ownership and of pride in the knowledge that we are doing something different, something better, and we believe in it.

This story was first published on DenverPost.com

Edibles company implicated in Colorado murder lawsuit isn’t covered, insurer says

Published: May 9, 2017, 2:17 pm • Updated: May 9, 2017, 2:17 pm

By Emma Gannon, Courthouse News

DENVER — An insurer refuses to cover a Colorado-based marijuana candy company for selling the “Karma Kandy Orange Ginger” under whose influence a man supposedly became psychotic and murdered his wife.

Hours before he shot and killed his wife on April 14, 2014, 49-year-old Richard Kirk had consumed a Karma Kandy Orange Ginger candy that he bought from the company Gaia’s Garden.

As Kirk readied for trial last year, pleading not guilty by reason of insanity, the couple’s three children brought what is believed to be the country’s first wrongful-death complaint against a recreational marijuana company.

Kirk later changed his plea. He is serving 30 years in state prison for his wife’s death, but the suit against Gaia’s Garden and its distributor, Nutritional Elements, is dragging on.

United Specialty Insurance fired back last week with a federal complaint against Gaia’s Garden and the children, through their guardians.

Denying that it has any obligation to defend the candy maker, United Specialty says Gaia’s Gardens is on its own.

“The policy specifically did not cover, and was not intended to cover, bodily injury arising out of one of Gaia’s products where the injury occurred after Gaia’s had ‘relinquished possession’ of the product — i.e., after the product was sold and distributed,” the complaint states.

“Per the allegations of the lawsuit, the bodily injury (the death of Kristine Kirk) occurred after the distribution and sale of the product. … Therefore, it was not a covered hazard under the policy.”

In fact, the insurer says, the policy had a psychotropic substances exclusion, for “any bodily injury ‘which would not have occurred, in whole or in part, but for the actual … ingestion of, contact with, exposure to … or presence of psychotropic substances.’ A copy of this endorsement is attached as Exhibit 5.” (Ellipses in complaint.)

Finally, United Specialty adds: “The psychotropic substances exclusion includes a (non-exclusive) list of psychotropic drugs. Included in the list are ‘marijuana’ and ‘cannabinoids.’” (Parentheses in complaint.)

The insurer also says that Nutritional Elements, the store that sold the drug to Kirk, has reached its own settlement with the family, and “United Specialty was likely prejudiced as a result.”

United Specialty seeks declaratory judgment that it has no duty to defend Gaia’s Garden or indemnify it for any loss. It is represented by Reid Neureiter with Wheeler Trigg O’Donnell. Neither this Denver attorney nor Gaia’s Garden has returned a request for comment.

In their 2016 lawsuit against Gaia’s Garden in Denver County Court, Kirk’s sons note that the label on the candy their father took purported to contain “101 mg. THC.”

Though a dose of 10 mg of THC is considered enough to get an average person high, the Denver Post reported that the candy police found at the crime scene, roughly the size of a Tootsie Roll, had been only partially consumed.

A toxicology test of Kirk’s blood from the night of the shooting also showed he had just 2.3 nanograms of THC per milliliter of blood. The state’s legal limit for stoned driving is 5 nanograms of THC per milliliter, according to the Denver Post.

Kirk’s children are seeking damages for negligence, failure to warn, wrongful death, deceptive trade, strict liability, breach of implied warranty, misrepresentation and consumer law violations. They are represented by Gregory Gold, of Greenwood Village.

The effects of marijuana can be much more powerful when it is eaten rather than smoked. New York Times columnist Maureen Dowd, on a visit to Colorado, wrote a much-cited column about the misery induced by eating marijuana candy.

One longtime jazz musician, no stranger to marijuana, told Courthouse News he suffered the same misery as Dowd after he ate marijuana candy on a visit to Denver. “I’ve smoked a lot of pot,” the musician said, “but it was nothing like that. It was not pleasant at all.”

Courthouse News editor Robert Kahn contributed reporting.

This story was first published on CourthouseNews.com

Sessions-driven DOJ memo will likely revive aggressive prosecution, mandatory minimum sentences

Published: May 9, 2017, 12:50 pm • Updated: May 9, 2017, 12:51 pm

By Sadie Gurman and Eric Tucker, The Associated Press

WASHINGTON — Justice Department officials have been weighing new guidance that would encourage prosecutors to charge suspects with the most serious offenses they can prove, a departure from Obama-era policies that aimed to reduce the federal prison population and reshape the criminal justice system.

The guidance is taking shape in the form of a memo that ultimately will be shared with the nation’s federal prosecutors, but the timeframe for release is unclear. Drafts of the memo have been circulating for weeks and have undergone revisions, so the final language is not yet certain.

A person involved in the discussions described one version to The Associated Press speaking only on condition of anonymity because the guidance has not been publicly announced. As outlined, that version would encourage prosecutors to charge people with the most serious, provable offenses — something more likely to trigger mandatory minimum sentences. Those rules limit a judge’s discretion and are typically dictated, for example, by the quantity of drugs involved in a crime.

Such a policy shift has been expected since Attorney General Jeff Sessions was appointed and is in keeping with his tough-on-crime public posture, resistance to proposals he sees as overly lenient and repeated statements about running a Justice Department that enforces laws as they’re written. In 2003, Attorney General John Ashcroft enacted a similar policy that directed prosecutors to “pursue the most serious, readily provable offense in all federal prosecutions.”

Department spokeswoman Sarah Isgur Flores told AP that Sessions has called for a review of all department policies ” to focus on keeping Americans safe and will be issuing further guidance and support to our prosecutors executing this priority — including an updated memorandum on charging for all criminal cases.”

The new policy statement is likely to represent a major departure from a 2013 initiative known as “Smart on Crime,” in which then-Attorney General Eric Holder discouraged harsh sentences for low-level, nonviolent offenders, which advocates say contributed to a national rethinking of how America’s drug criminals should be prosecuted.

Holder’s guidance was aimed at reducing costs of a crowded federal prison system, encouraging shorter sentences for drug offenders not seen as threat to public safety and preserving Justice Department resources for more serious and violent criminals.

The Obama policy shift coincided with U.S. Sentencing Commission changes that made tens of thousands of federal drug prisoners eligible for early release, and an Obama administration clemency initiative that freed convicts deemed deserving of a second chance. Combined, those changes led to a steep decline in a federal prison population that now stands at just under 190,000, down from nearly 220,000 in 2013. Nearly half of those inmates are in custody for drug crimes, records show.

Obama administration officials cited that decline and a drop in the overall number of drug prosecutions as evidence that policies were working as intended. They argued prosecutors were getting pickier about the cases they were bringing and were seeking mandatory minimum sentences less often. Efforts to overhaul the criminal justice system secured bipartisan support in recent years as Republicans embraced its cost-cutting potential while Democrats saw a chance to correct what they consider unduly harsh sentences.

Still, some prosecutors felt constrained by the Holder directive and expressed concern that they’d lose plea bargaining leverage — and a key inducement for cooperation — without the ability to more freely pursue years-long mandatory minimum punishments.

Sessions himself has long signaled his opposition to the “Smart on Crime” policies, and has repeatedly warned that eliminating mandatory minimums weakens the ability of law enforcement to protect the public.

In the Senate, he was among a group of GOP lawmakers last year who opposed legislation that would have allowed judges to reduce prison time for some drug offenders. He warned that the bill would release thousands of violent felons and endanger lives, at a time when crime in some large cities was rising.

After becoming attorney general, he promised in March there would be new guidance on criminal charges. He also directed the nation’s federal prosecutors to intensify their focus on the worst violent offenders.

“My vision of a smart way to do this is, let’s take that arrest, lets hammer that criminal who’s distributing drugs that have been imported in our country,” Sessions said in a speech that month to law enforcement officials that some advocates viewed as a harbinger of his intent to revise Holder’s policies.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 13
  • Page 14
  • Page 15
  • Page 16
  • Page 17
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 46
  • Go to Next Page »
Access Politics Health Higher Learning
Licensed Producers Dispensaries Clinics

Cultivate Change © 2026 WeedHub | info@weedhub.ca