• Skip to main content

New studies shine light on cannabis consumers’ spending habits

Published: Apr 26, 2017, 5:51 pm • Updated: Apr 26, 2017, 6:02 pm

By Alex Pasquariello and Alicia Wallace, The Cannabist

America’s legal marijuana market topped $6.5 billion in 2016 and is projected to grow to $24 billion by 2025, yet data-driven insights into consumers have remained elusive.

Two new studies are shining a light on the cannabis consumer, providing insight into actual purchase behavior as the industry prepares for four new state recreational markets, including California, and six new medical markets expected to come online in the next eight months.

As the legal recreational and medical cannabis industry matures, consumers are increasingly open to experimenting with new products and delivery methods, including concentrates and infused edibles, according to a report released Wednesday by cannabis analytics firm New Frontier Data.

Meanwhile, sales of traditional dried marijuana, a.k.a. flower, are on the decline.

In 2016 alone, recreational demand for flower fell from 85 percent of sales in January to 64 percent in December. The decrease was mirrored in medical markets, where flower’s share fell from 87 percent of sales to 65 percent.

During that period, medical markets saw demand for concentrates grow from 10 percent of sales to 27 percent, according to the report. On the recreational side, concentrates grew from 10 percent of sales to 21 percent, while demand for pre-rolled joints grew from 1 percent of sales to 8 percent.

The shift away from flower toward higher price-point concentrates, edibles and pre-roll joints reflects a legal industry commercializing and scaling “in the light of day,” said John Kagia, New Frontier Data’s vice president of industry analytics.

“Concentrate-filled vape pens and sophisticated, dosed edibles simply weren’t available in the illicit market,” Kagia said in an interview with The Cannabist. “Pre-rolled products have gone from an afterthought filled with leftover cannabis to a premium product made with high-end strains and sold in elegant, easy transport packages.”

Other factors that could be influencing consumer behavior is the desire for discretion and a general negative perception of smoking, Kagia said.

“You can smell a joint from a mile away, but vaping offers a discreet way to consume,” he said. “Our society has also undergone a radical transformation in our views towards smoking tobacco, so the perceived benefits of vaping rather than smoking may also be one factor for the market shift.”

The trend toward infused products such as edibles is particularly acute in Colorado’s recreational market, where retailers moved more than three times as many infused products as medical dispensaries did in the first half of 2016, according to the report.

Medical marijuana consumers spend more

While recreational legalization was expected to cannibalize Colorado’s medical market, the report found that strong demand for pricey concentrates and edibles buoyed sales figures in the face of declining patient participation. While the number of patients enrolled on the state medical marijuana registry ebbs and flows, the report noted a decline from 107,534 in December 2015 to 94,577 in December 2016. However, tax revenues from medical sales remained steady throughout 2016 at about $1 million per month.

To gather the data, Washington, D.C.-based New Frontier Data partnered with Baker Technologies, a Colorado-based retail and marketing platform used by more than 300 retail marijuana shops and medical dispensaries in 10 states, to track consumer behavior in key markets including California, Oregon, Colorado, New Mexico and Washington.

New Frontier and Baker found that medical patients spend three times more on cannabis than recreational users.

In 2016, U.S. medical consumers on average shopped once every 10 days and spent $136 per transaction. In contrast, recreational consumers shopped once every 14 days and spent $49 per transaction.

Medical patients are purchasing larger quantities of the same product, Kagia said. Meanwhile, recreational consumers are purchasing smaller quantities more frequently so they can sample the myriad strains on the market.

Interest in cannabis consumer demographics extends beyond marijuana industry

Mining granular consumer data is also a sweet spot for Boulder’s BDS Analytics, a market research firm that tracks point-of-sale data at marijuana stores.

Last year, BDS launched a consumer research survey to get a better sense of the various types of cannabis consumer. In recent weeks, the firm has started to show the fruits of that labor by quietly releasing some data from its first comprehensive survey of adults in Colorado and California.

“We’re seeing some real differences between men and women, age groups, generations, attitudes and preferred methods of consumption,” said Linda Gilbert, a 30-year market research veteran who is heading BDS’ efforts on this front.

The survey will be updated every six months, but the initial results have been telling regarding aspects such as lifestyle and demographics, said Gilbert, who has conducted similar research for industries such as natural foods, pharmaceuticals and alcohol.

And companies within those industries — among others — are calling Gilbert to learn more about the cannabis consumer.

“If I’m not in the cannabis space and even if I have no intention of going into the cannabis space, I have to, as a marketing person, start to look at this as a new consumer cohort that I should try to communicate with,” she said.

For example, survey participants who have consumed cannabis in the past six months are more likely to be engaged in physical activity on a once-a-week or greater basis than people who don’t use cannabis, she said. The survey showed that 56 percent of consumers partook in outdoor recreation, compared with 34 percent of non-consumers; 53 percent of consumers hit the gym, versus 33 percent of non-consumers; and 42 percent of consumers engaged in yoga or Pilates, versus 21 percent of non-consumers.

“That’s one of the things that’s been really fascinating to me is how much it becomes part of a routine and lifestyle,” she said. “But it’s not a couch-potato lifestyle, it’s a healthy lifestyle.”

From focus-group interviews, BDS found that men are using cannabis to relax and to enjoy recreationally with friends, she said, adding that women said they consume to address anxiety, stress and pain such as menstrual cramps.

Gilbert’s BDS team also gleaned that women make up the majority of new consumers.

That knowledge could be incredibly powerful for companies within and outside of the cannabis industry, she said, reflecting on the launch of women-targeted products like Virginia Slims or energy bars.

“For the people who are not in the industry, more of this sort of mile-high view is important,” she said. “And for them, they all need the consumer data. I think there is a consensus that they’re going to be impacted.”

Colorado House votes to bar cops from helping with federal marijuana crackdown

Published: Apr 26, 2017, 2:46 pm • Updated: Apr 26, 2017, 3:02 pm

By The Associated Press

DENVER — Colorado may prohibit law enforcement officers from assisting in a potential federal marijuana crackdown.

The state House voted 56-7 Wednesday to bar public employees from assisting federal agents in “arresting a Colorado citizen for committing an act that is a Colorado constitutional right.”

The Colorado bill doesn’t specifically mention marijuana. But sponsors say it is inspired by threats that federal authorities may try cracking down on the marijuana industry. Federal authorities generally rely on local law enforcement to enforce federal drug law.

California lawmakers are considering a similar bill.

Colorado is also considering a measure to allow marijuana growers to reclassify recreational pot as medical pot, a gambit to avoid federal seizure of recreational pot plants.

The Trump Administration has sent mixed messages on whether a marijuana crackdown is planned.

New report: For first time, drug use more likely than alcohol in fatal crashes

Published: Apr 26, 2017, 11:12 am • Updated: Apr 26, 2017, 11:12 am

By Ashley Halsey III, The Washington Post

For the first time, statistics show that drivers killed in crashes are more likely to be on drugs than drunk.

Forty-three percent of drivers tested in fatal crashes in 2015 had used a legal or illegal drug, eclipsing the 37 percent who tested above the legal limit for alcohol, according to a report released Wednesday by the Governors Highway Safety Association (GHSA) and the Foundation for Advancing Alcohol Responsibility.

Of the drivers who tested positive for drugs, more than a third had used marijuana and more than 9 percent had taken amphetamines.

“As drunken driving has declined, drugged driving has increased dramatically, and many of today’s impaired drivers are combining two or more substances,” said Ralph S. Blackman, president of the foundation, a nonprofit founded and funded by a group of distillers.

The report is narrowly focused on fatal crashes. It shows that among fatally injured drivers with known test results, 2015 was the first time that drug use was more prevalent than alcohol use.

Beyond that, however, it draws on other studies and statistics that create a complicated portrait of legal and illegal drug use nationwide. Every state bans driving under the influence of drugs or alcohol.

The opioid epidemic – heroin use and the abuse of prescription drugs – is well established. In 2015, more than 33,000 people fatally overdosed on opioids, almost equal to the 35,095 people killed that year in all traffic crashes.

The number of drivers who tested positive for drugs after dying in a crash rose from almost 28 percent in 2005 to 43 percent in 2015, the latest year for which data is available.

Though the dates when each state passed a law vary, that period coincided with more-permissive laws covering the use of marijuana.

Medical use of the drug is now allowed in 29 states and the District of Columbia; 17 states permit its use in some medical circumstances; use has been decriminalized in 21 states; and recreational use is allowed in eight states and the District.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has promised to reinvigorate the war on drugs, reversing an Obama administration policy that reduced prison sentences for nonviolent drug offenders.

Although the liberalization of marijuana laws and increase in drug-use fatalities might lead to an easy conclusion, the report cites European studies that found marijuana use slightly increased the risk of a crash, while opioids, amphetamines and mixing alcohol with drugs greatly increased the risk of a crash.

Counterbalancing that assessment of crash risk is this stark statistic: In Colorado, marijuana-related traffic deaths increased by 48 percent after the state legalized recreational use of the drug.

“Drugged driving is a complicated issue,” said Jim Hedlund, a former National Highway Traffic Safety Administration official who wrote the GHSA report. “The more we can synthesize the latest research and share what’s going on around the country to address drug-impaired driving, the better positioned states will be to prevent it.”

Unlike the blood alcohol standard of 0.08, which often can be established at the scene of a crash, testing for drug use is more complex, usually requiring a blood test, and the effect of drug use can vary substantially among users.

Surveys of regular marijuana users in Colorado and Washington state, which also has legalized recreational use, found that almost none of them thought marijuana use impaired their driving, while they believed drinking alcohol did.

The challenge to police in attempting to enforce laws against drug-using drivers is compounded because many officers lack training to identify those under the influence of drugs, and delays in testing may allow the drug to metabolize so the results do not accurately measure the concentration in the driver’s system at the time of the incident.

“As states across the country continue to struggle with drug-impaired driving, it’s critical that we help them understand the current landscape and provide examples of best practices so they can craft the most effective countermeasures,” said Jonathan Adkins, executive director of GHSA.

Too soon: Police bust marijuana grow of Vermont man who thought state would legalize shortly

Published: Apr 26, 2017, 9:58 am • Updated: Apr 26, 2017, 9:58 am

By The Associated Press

ST. ALBANS, Vt. — Vermont police have arrested a man who acknowledged growing marijuana to prepare for possible statewide legalization of the drug.

St. Albans police say they came across Michael Marshall while investigating a hunting violation. Marshall fled into a house after a confrontation with police, and then consented to a search of the residence. Police say they then found and seized 13 full-grown marijuana plants and 27 smaller plants.

Police say Marshall told them he thought marijuana would be legalized soon, so he wanted to get an early start on growing it for future sale.

The possession of small amounts of marijuana has been decriminalized in the state of Vermont, but it is still illegal for recreational use.

Police issued Marshall a citation to appear in court next month.

International org takes on creating safety and other standards for cannabis industry

Published: Apr 25, 2017, 4:33 pm • Updated: Apr 26, 2017, 7:26 am

By Alicia Wallace, The Cannabist Staff

ASTM International, a century-old standards organization, gave the official go-ahead to establish a standards-writing committee for the cannabis industry, officials announced Tuesday.

ASTM’s board of directors approved the formation of Committee D37, a group that will develop standards for cannabis, its products and processes, officials said. The committee, reported on by The Cannabist in March, is scheduled to hold its first meeting on June 11.

“This committee will help meet a need for safety and standardization in this fast-growing industry,” Dr. Ralph Paroli, D37 chairman and director of R&D in measurement science and standards at the National Research Council of Canada, said in a statement. “With decades of experience working with industries such as agriculture, packaging, pesticides, and pharmaceuticals, ASTM International and its members are uniquely qualified to develop standards for the cannabis industry.”

The new cannabis committee plans to develop standards in the following technical areas:

• Indoor and outdoor horticulture and agriculture
• Quality management systems
• Laboratory
• Processing and handling
• Security and transportation
• Personnel training, assessment and credentialing

Alicia Wallace joined The Cannabist in July 2016, covering national marijuana policy and business. She contributes to the Denver Post’s beer industry coverage. In her 13 years as a business news reporter, her coverage has spanned the economy, Sports…

Massachusetts sheriffs: Increase proposed marijuana tax, use money for addiction treatment

Published: Apr 25, 2017, 1:49 pm • Updated: Apr 25, 2017, 1:49 pm

By Bob Salsberg, The Associated Press

BOSTON — Sheriffs urged state lawmakers Monday to boost the tax consumers will pay on recreational marijuana and earmark the additional revenue for substance abuse prevention and treatment.

The proposal was discussed at the final hearing of a special legislative committee that was set up to review the marijuana law voters approved in November. The panel is expected to issue recommendations by June.

“Not everyone will smoke responsibly, much in the same way many people don’t drink responsibly,” said Hampshire County Sheriff Patrick Cahillane, who predicted an uptick in addiction and more arrests from driving under the influence of marijuana.

The law currently calls for a 3.75 percent excise tax on retail marijuana sales, expected to begin in mid-2018. The excise would be imposed on top of the state’s regular 6.25 percent sales tax, and local communities would have the option of tacking on an additional 2 percent tax.

The Massachusetts tax would be lower than those imposed in several Western states, including Colorado, Oregon and Washington, that previously legalized recreational marijuana.

Sen. Patricia Jehlen, co-chairwoman of the Legislature’s Marijuana Policy Committee, said she believed many lawmakers were receptive to the idea of earmarking some revenue from pot taxes to addiction prevention and treatment. But Jehlen has been skeptical of boosting taxes, arguing they should be low enough to entice consumers to purchase the drug legally and not continue relying on the underground market.

Cahillane and Hampden County Sheriff Nicholas Cocchi said nine of the state’s 14 sheriffs are sponsoring a proposal that would boost the pot excise tax by 5 percent.

Advocates of legal marijuana have disputed claims that marijuana can be addictive or serve as a gateway drug to opioids and other more dangerous substances.

Jehlen said she’s seen no evidence of a surge in addiction in other states that have legalized recreational marijuana.

Cocchi clarified: “I’m not saying everyone who smokes a joint is going to become an addict.” But he pointed to his own experience of trying to cope with substance abuse through the county correctional system and the lack of financial resources available from the state to deal with the crisis.

“Let’s earmark that money … and start to make a dent in the substantial lack of services around the commonwealth,” he said.

  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 46
  • Go to Next Page »
Access Politics Health Higher Learning
Licensed Producers Dispensaries Clinics

Cultivate Change © 2026 WeedHub | info@weedhub.ca